Saturday, February 7, 2026
Smart Again
  • Home
  • Trending
  • Politics
  • Law & Defense
  • Community
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
Smart Again
  • Home
  • Trending
  • Politics
  • Law & Defense
  • Community
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
Smart Again
No Result
View All Result
Home Trending

The Supreme Court just handed Trump a rare — and very significant — loss

December 23, 2025
in Trending
Reading Time: 4 mins read
0 0
A A
0
The Supreme Court just handed Trump a rare — and very significant — loss
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter


The same Supreme Court that ruled that President Donald Trump is allowed to use the powers of the presidency to commit crimes finally placed a meaningful limit on Trump’s authority on Tuesday.

In Trump v. Illinois, three Republican justices joined all three of the Court’s Democrats in ruling that Trump violated federal law when he deployed a few hundred members of the National Guard to squelch protests outside of an immigration detention facility in Broadview, Illinois, which is about 12 miles west of Chicago.

Notably, however, Justice Brett Kavanaugh wrote a separate opinion saying he would have ruled against Trump on very narrow grounds. So, it appears that only a bare majority of the justices voted to place significant limits on Trump’s authority to deploy the military against Americans located on US soil.

Trump attempted to use the military against a small number of protesters outside of the Broadview facility. According to Judge April Perry, a federal district judge who previously heard this case, “the typical number of protestors is fewer than fifty,” and “the crowd has never exceeded 200.”

Nevertheless, Trump claimed the authority to use National Guard members against this minor protest under a federal law that permits the federal government to take command of the Guard (which is ordinarily controlled by states) if there is “a rebellion or danger of a rebellion against the authority of the Government of the United States” or if “the President is unable with the regular forces to execute the laws of the United States.”

The Supreme Court’s Tuesday order does not even engage with Trump’s implausible claim that several dozen people protesting an immigration facility (some of whom have been charged with crimes) constitute a “rebellion.” Instead, it focuses largely on Trump’s claim that he could deploy the Guard because he is “unable” to execute US law without it.

The first part of the Court’s response to Trump is a bit alarming. The Court’s order explains that the words “regular forces,” as it is used by the relevant statute, “likely refers to the regular forces of the United States military.” Thus, Trump cannot use the National Guard unless he is somehow unable to enforce the law by using the full might of the United States Army, Navy, Air Force, and Marines.

This argument could be troubling, because it seems to goad Trump into actually attempting to use the regular Army or Marines on political protesters. But, the Court’s Illinois order also contains some language suggesting that his power to use the regular military is also limited.

The circumstances when Trump may do so, the Court explains, are “exceptional.” That is because a separate federal law prohibits the military from “execut[ing] the laws” outside of “cases and under circumstances expressly authorized by the Constitution or Act of Congress.” And, as the Court’s brief order notes, Trump “has not invoked a statute” that permits him to use the regular military to execute the laws.

That said, the Illinois order is unlikely to be the end of this conflict. As Kavanaugh notes in his separate opinion, Trump might attempt to deploy regular troops under the Insurrection Act, which permits the military to “suppress, in a State, any insurrection, domestic violence, unlawful combination, or conspiracy” — but only in limited circumstances.

The Justice Department has long interpreted these circumstances very narrowly. A 1964 memorandum signed by then-Deputy Attorney General Nicholas Katzenbach, for example, indicates that the Insurrection Act may only be invoked when “those engaging in violence are either acting with the approval of state authorities or have, like the Klan in the 1870s, taken over effective control of the area involved.”

It remains to be seen whether all five of the justices who joined Tuesday’s full-throated rebuke of Trump will adhere to Katzenbach’s view if Trump does attempt to use the Insurrection Act. Still, the Illinois order does strongly suggest that even this Supreme Court is suspicious of a president who claimed broad authority to use the military against Americans.

Justice Samuel Alito, the Court’s most reliable Republican partisan, wrote a dissent that would have given Trump extraordinarily broad authority to target Americans with military force. Among other things, Alito argues that all Trump needs to do to overcome the “unable with the regular forces” language in federal law is to simply say that he has “determined that the regular forces of the United States are not sufficient.” But Alito’s opinion was joined only by Justice Clarence Thomas.

Justice Neil Gorsuch also dissented, but mostly on procedural grounds.

So, the bottom line is that, at least for now, a bare majority of the Supreme Court seems to believe that Trump should not have limitless power to use military force against US citizens on US soil.



Source link

Tags: CourtDonald TrumphandedlossPoliticsrareSignificantSupremeSupreme CourtTrump
Previous Post

Greta Thunberg arrested in London while supporting Palestine Action hunger strike

Next Post

Supreme Court tells Trump he can’t use the military to police Chicago

Related Posts

Trump abolishes the Second Amendment
Trending

Trump abolishes the Second Amendment

February 7, 2026
CONTINUANCE: Judge Stops Ramos Family’s Immediate Deportation
Trending

CONTINUANCE: Judge Stops Ramos Family’s Immediate Deportation

February 7, 2026
If Jasmine Crockett wins, she wants to do it her way
Trending

If Jasmine Crockett wins, she wants to do it her way

February 7, 2026
Three-Time Trump Voter Apologizes After Racist Obama Post
Trending

Three-Time Trump Voter Apologizes After Racist Obama Post

February 7, 2026
The appalling spectacle surrounding Nancy Guthrie’s disappearance
Trending

The appalling spectacle surrounding Nancy Guthrie’s disappearance

February 6, 2026
Trump’s racist post, briefly explained
Trending

Trump’s racist post, briefly explained

February 6, 2026
Next Post
Supreme Court tells Trump he can’t use the military to police Chicago

Supreme Court tells Trump he can’t use the military to police Chicago

Did Vincent Van Gogh Cut Off His Ear?

Did Vincent Van Gogh Cut Off His Ear?

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  • Trending
  • Comments
  • Latest
MAKA: Make America Kittens Again

MAKA: Make America Kittens Again

November 18, 2024
Trump inauguration pulls in 0 million in donations, doubling previous record

Trump inauguration pulls in $200 million in donations, doubling previous record

January 4, 2025
As Conclave Nears, Catholics Wonder if New Pope Will Support Latin Mass

As Conclave Nears, Catholics Wonder if New Pope Will Support Latin Mass

May 5, 2025
Thomas Gaither, Who Chose Jail After Civil Rights Sit-ins, Dies at 86

Thomas Gaither, Who Chose Jail After Civil Rights Sit-ins, Dies at 86

January 25, 2025
Here’s What The Shutdown Is REALLY About

Here’s What The Shutdown Is REALLY About

October 8, 2025
New docs show DHS is gathering driver’s license data in voter fraud crusade

New docs show DHS is gathering driver’s license data in voter fraud crusade

November 14, 2025
“They stole an election”: Former Florida senator found guilty in “ghost candidates” scandal

“They stole an election”: Former Florida senator found guilty in “ghost candidates” scandal

0
The prime of Dame Maggie Smith is a gift

The prime of Dame Maggie Smith is a gift

0
The Hawaii senator who faced down racism and ableism—and killed Nazis

The Hawaii senator who faced down racism and ableism—and killed Nazis

0
The murder rate fell at the fastest-ever pace last year—and it’s still falling

The murder rate fell at the fastest-ever pace last year—and it’s still falling

0
Trump used the site of the first assassination attempt to spew falsehoods

Trump used the site of the first assassination attempt to spew falsehoods

0
MAGA church plans to raffle a Trump AR-15 at Second Amendment rally

MAGA church plans to raffle a Trump AR-15 at Second Amendment rally

0
JD Vance booed at Winter Olympics amid anti-ICE protests

JD Vance booed at Winter Olympics amid anti-ICE protests

February 7, 2026
Trump abolishes the Second Amendment

Trump abolishes the Second Amendment

February 7, 2026
CONTINUANCE: Judge Stops Ramos Family’s Immediate Deportation

CONTINUANCE: Judge Stops Ramos Family’s Immediate Deportation

February 7, 2026
If Jasmine Crockett wins, she wants to do it her way

If Jasmine Crockett wins, she wants to do it her way

February 7, 2026
Drive racists out of public life forever, and other lessons from Black history

Drive racists out of public life forever, and other lessons from Black history

February 7, 2026
Three-Time Trump Voter Apologizes After Racist Obama Post

Three-Time Trump Voter Apologizes After Racist Obama Post

February 7, 2026
Smart Again

Stay informed with Smart Again, the go-to news source for liberal perspectives and in-depth analysis on politics, social justice, and more. Join us in making news smart again.

CATEGORIES

  • Community
  • Law & Defense
  • Politics
  • Trending
  • Uncategorized
No Result
View All Result

LATEST UPDATES

  • JD Vance booed at Winter Olympics amid anti-ICE protests
  • Trump abolishes the Second Amendment
  • CONTINUANCE: Judge Stops Ramos Family’s Immediate Deportation
  • About Us
  • Advertise with Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • DMCA
  • Cookie Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact Us

Copyright © 2024 Smart Again.
Smart Again is not responsible for the content of external sites.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Trending
  • Politics
  • Law & Defense
  • Community
  • Contact Us

Copyright © 2024 Smart Again.
Smart Again is not responsible for the content of external sites.

Go to mobile version